I would consider a cheaper version of this concept. I have no doubt you have already considered this list in far greater detail and I would love to hear your thoughts.
- Single driven rear wheel with belt drive.
- FRP Body
- Hard coated lexan body Panels only in white
- Hard coated lexan window
- Body Panels easily and cheaply replaced
- 3rd party android tablet, interface for non-safety controls.
- JBL Flip equivalent in the dash for the cars audio.
- Battery good for ~ 100kms
- Use as many parts from existing scooters, motorbikes, quad-bikes as possible.
- Standard 240/110V charging connector.
- 50kW Power
- Regular doors.
- Only the minimum safety features, front airbags and some sort of crumple zone.
- 3d printed or machined metal parts? Steel tubular space frame front crumple zone?
- Car arrives as a kit the user assembles and can self service when parts fail. Electrical connections will need to be IP rated plugs. Open source component designs and let China happen.
- Standard motorbike/scooter tyres.
- Open source the entire car. Aptera can focus on change management, regional standards compliance and base builds.
As a manufacturing engineer with a background in aerospace composites, I think that the biggest cost will be creating the body structure and bringing it to a presentable finish. My suggestions for cost reduction would be using a "crushcore" process for the exterior panels and flat panel cut-and-fold for the inner structure. The crush core process has a cycle time of less than 30 minutes for a pre-CNC trimmed part that is structural and highly repeatable. The flat panel requires some cure time, but little labor as panel finish can be easily covered in a fabric material. I love the car and the concept, but I think that to scale the fabrication of the composites will be challenging. Resin infusion provides a great finish with lots of fabric control, but is incredibly wasteful (vacuum bagging material) and tool intensive (tool needs to be perfectly cleaned and prepped before each part is layed up) with a very long cycle time for the tool. Maybe 3 per day? Good for low volume, but not scalable.